What Is The Legislature Trying To Hide

The House passed its versions of tax bill(s) over the weekend, working well into the night and adjourning at at an un-Godly hour.

I ask this: why then? Why so late?

We already know the answer:

So why the special session? The Democrats have a monopoly on power, and they
believe in big government, endless programs, and ever-growing taxation. They
just can't wait to shove it down our throats, and they don't want to wait until
the regular session because there is too high of a chance that the public would
actually get what it wants--reasonable tax policy.

If the legislators listened to what their constituents had to say, or even allowed for fair opportunity to hear citizen testimony, they wouldn't be able to pass such grossly irresponsible and unnecessary measures.

But then again, who are we to expect that our legislators would listen to what we have to say?

John Astle: Fake As A $3 Bill

As you probably know by know, John Astle voted against final passage of the tax bill, only after failing to stop such a measure from reaching the floor when he had the chance, and effectively showing his true (lack of) commitment in stopping the legalized theft that will soon haunt all Marylanders.

As I predicted, he is wasting no time enjoying his political cover to spew the false rhetoric that he cares about the common man.

From today's Capital:

Both senators John Astle, D-Annapolis, and Ed DeGrange, Sr.,
D-GlenBurnie, voted it down.

“I’m not a big government Democrat,” Mr. Astle said. “I had
somesympathy with people that don’t want to give up more of their money. I just
inall good conscience couldn’t support this package.”

Give me a freeking break.

When given the chance to comment on the danger of even higher tax increases that may be passed by people in the House that are allegedly more liberal than he, Senator Astle warned:

That has the potential for taking the wheels off this truck. If thathappens,
it comes apart

.
Don't believe the Astle hype--he is as liberal as they come. When I have some time I will look up his voting record and post it as an edit to this post, but off the top of my head, he has supported in-state tuition for illegal aliens, and voted for tax increases on numerous prior occasions.

Rest assured that John Astle is a big-government liberal.

Maryland Senate Doesn't Fix Budget "Deficit": It Worsens It!!

I want to take a minute to point out that at this moment in time, we don't have a budget deficit. Indeed, the special session is predicated on an expected budget deficit for next fiscal year based on all the spending the Democrats want to do. If during the next regular session the legislature were to reduce spending, we wouldn't have a deficit! If they simply waited until the regular session to do ANYTHING, good or bad, at least the public would have adequate time to show what they really think.

So why the special session? The Democrats have a monopoly on power, and they believe in big government, endless programs, and ever-growing taxation. They just can't wait to shove it down our throats, and they don't want to wait until the regular session because there is too high of a chance that the public would actually get what it wants--reasonable tax policy.

Moving on, even if you take the political-speak at face value, the purpose of this special session was to FIX the budget deficit. So what did our legislators do? Just the opposite.

A version of Governor O'Malley's proposed expansion in health care coverage passed in the Senate yesterday, and a similar version of the bill is expected to pass in the House today. When the dust settles, THIS WILL COST US $200-$600 MILLION MORE EVERY YEAR.

I have health insurance that covers myself and 1 other person, which costs me $582 every month. I own a seasonal business (7 months out of the year), and each of my 14 employees are eligible for health insurance, of which I pay 50%. Their premiums are either $209, $252, or $291 PER PERSON PER MONTH, and I pay my half year round--even when we are not operating. This is a lot of money that I pay--why should I have to kick in my share of $200-$600 million for everyone else?

For those of you who don't like math, I will tell you that it is easier to eliminate a budget deficit when you spend less money. If, however, you wish to push through an unpopular program at a bad time with the least resistance possible, simply refer to what is happening this week.