Showing posts with label police vacancies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label police vacancies. Show all posts

Sunday, January 20, 2008

Police Department "Did You Know"

The Mayor recently sent out a fact sheet regarding the police department, a strategy and position that will be futile in mitigating the backlash stemming from her inexplicable denial that the crime trends are going in the wrong direction.

I was not on the Mayor's email list, but fortunately the document found its way to my highly active email inbox, allowing for this analysis. Actually, it's not really an analysis; the problem is evident--a blind man could see it in a minute. Let's take a word-for-word look at the mayor's response to demands for action.

The Annapolis Police Department received National Accreditation in March, 2004 and was reaccredited in March, 2007. This puts the APD in elite company along with only 29 out of 183 police agencies in Maryland and 593 of approximately 17,000 police agencies in the United States.

Here we go! This fact is irrelevant; the elite accreditation status of the APD has nothing to do with our crime problem. "Fully staffed departments with effective tactics don't solve crime--accreditations solve crimes", the saying does not go.

Annapolis Police are among the highest paid and have the best health and retirement benefits in the state. The current pay for newly hired officers -- $44,630.00 annually -- is among the highest in Maryland. It is substantially higher than the starting salaries paid by Baltimore City, Anne Arundel County, Baltimore County, Howard County, and Montgomery County.

The problem here is that the $5000 hiring bonus is included in that $44,000+ figure. So, the first year they make that much, but in the second year when there is no bonus, they have to take a pay cut to under $40,000. Not good. And not better than other jurisdictions.

There have been 51 officers hired since 2002 and 7 new officers were hired in 2007.

But how many retired? And how many positions remain vacant despite funding? And most importantly, even if we hired ten thousand officers, is crime getting better? (Answers: a handful, 18, no.)

The national clearance rate average for homicides is between 50-75%. Annapolis' clearance rate for homicides consistently surpasses the 80% mark. Over the past 5 years, the department has cleared 17 of 19 homicides. In addition, the clearance rate for all crimes reviewed nationally is about 21-22%. The Annapolis Police Department averages 30% for all cases reviewed.

First of all, how can the clearance rate average be between 50 and 75%? If you have national statistics, you should have a single number. Anyway, a city where you know all of 100 murderers is inferior to a city where you don't know the only murderer. See what I'm saying? But, good work to the APD for the higher than average clearance rate.

Chief Johnson, Captain Imhof, Captain Marshall, Lieutenant Powell, Lieutenant Della and Sergeant Hall have all received training at the FBI National Academy.

I have received training from the Oxford Institute for Influential Blogging, yet this is merely the 63rd most influential political blog in Ward 5.

Captain Simpson, Lieutenant Powell and Lieutenant Cynthia Howard have all been trained at the Southern Police Institute.

George W. Bush went to Yale.

1/3 of City of Annapolis Police Officers have either some college or full degrees.

Enough already. Nobody is doubting the ability of the rank officers. The issue is: without their full compliment of resources--specifically more officers--they cannot be fully effective..

The training process to become a member of the Annapolis Police Department includes 6 month training at a police academy and 8-12 weeks of field training. The entire process takes between 8-10 months. Annapolis uses police academies in Howard County, Baltimore City and occasionally Frederick. Training dates vary and occur between late September and early January.

This "did you know" is becoming more and more unrelated to the issue at hand. Who is complaining about the training process? Actually, I want to complain--notice how (A) we don't have a police department of our own and (B) how we don't send our recruits to Anne Arundel County because they steal our officers away from us by offering higher pay!

The national ratio of officers per 1000 citizens is 1 per thousand. The Annapolis Police Department currently maintains a ratio of 3.6 officers per thousand citizens.

I recently saw this described as a "tortured" argument, which is highly brilliant commentary worthy of mention. Ratios such as this are not useful because:

1. The International Chiefs Of Police say so.

2. Annapolis has an abnormally high density of public housing, which accounts for most murders and a disproportionately high number of drug crimes.

3. We are a capital city and have a unique non-resident population.

I have chosen to present the mayor's document in it's entirety, so now you will have to read through some boring statistics before arriving at the next bit of brilliant commentary. Also, take a look at this article called Officer-per-thousand Formulas and Other Policing Myths. You'll particulary enjoy the part where it says "We have worked.........for managers with 3.6 officers per thousand who delcare they cannot do proactive policing without more cops". What a fabulous concidence--we have 3.6 officers per thousand!

Statistics - The numbers game

The charts included in the addendum of this report include data supplied by the Annapolis Police Department to the FBI that accurately reveals significant progress in the City’s commitment to improve public safety and security.

In 2005, 2097 violent crimes were reported, the lowest number reported in the City since 1990. And while it is true that 2006 showed a nationwide spike in crime levels, the 2,415 crimes reported in Annapolis were still far less than the levels of nearly 3000 crimes per year reported in the mid 90’s. As of July, the year 2007 is showing a downward trend-some 6% lower than last year, and 2% lower than 2005.

The charts also show that the number of officers currently on the streets protecting the citizens of Annapolis is consistent with, and, in some cases, higher, than historical numbers.

Some attempt to show crime rates by comparing the numbers of incidents with the census population of a city. These types of comparisons are convenient but inaccurate, especially when discussing a City like Annapolis. They do not take into account the common sense factor that the City of Annapolis entertains more than 4 million visitors each year and may, on any given day, have over 100,000 people inside her borders. The Naval Academy, St. John’s College and other state and federal residents and employees are not included in the census for Annapolis.

And, we're back. DID YOU JUST READ THAT???!!! The mayor speaks of the "common sense factor" that this city is a Capital city and has a high non-resident population. Isn't this the same common sense factor that would invalidate officer-to-population ratios?

Other destination communities like Ocean City, Maryland, with a census population of approximately 8000 and a non-resident population of over 200,000 on many days face the same challenge.

Statistics, when manipulated, can be used to “prove” that based on the number of crimes per 100,000 residents, Ocean City is a much more dangerous place than Washington, DC or Baltimore.


So let's forget ratios. The city for the second year in a row has set a record number of murders, with 8 and 9 respectively for the past 2 years. The early pace for 2008 is 36! Any worries? Plus, Ocean City is a terrible comparison that is not made anywhere else. Are you really trying to deny there is a problem?

Using the numbers, Ocean City, Maryland, a “city” of approximately 8000 people, would show a crime rate about 300% higher than the national average. Double or triple the rates of cities like Newark, Detroit, Baltimore and Atlanta. Using the census population to number of crimes comparison would lead one to conclude that they are four times more likely to be robbed, six times more likely to be burglarized, seven times more likely to be raped, and ten times more likely to be assaulted in Ocean City than in Washington, DC.

Common sense says that is simply not possible in a city of 8000 people.

But, when Ocean City’s public safety numbers are compared to those of a city of 200,000 – the number of people that may actually be there on any given day - they fall far below national averages. Richmond, Virginia has just under 200,000 residents. They had 84 murders in 2005. Ocean City had one.

So, are you saying that the tourists here are the problem? ARE THE TOURISTS THE PROBLEM? NO. THIS IS WHY OCEAN CITY IS A TERRIBLE COMPARISON.

Someone seeing the numbers alone could easily make the mistake of assuming that the crime rate in Annapolis is higher than that of the national average for a City of its size.

Or, they could call upon their first-grade arithmetic skills and understand that 9 murders is more than 8 murders, and try to fix a problem.

Again, common sense says that is not true.

If you want common sense, I'll give it to you. If you asked anybody who didn't follow the issue what to do about the crime problem, they would say fix the projects. That's common sense. We have a lot of public housing, section 8, subsidized housing--whatever you want to call it. And many to most of the drug and violent crimes happen in or near these areas, or by someone living in or near these areas.

When Annapolis’ numbers are compared to a city of 120,000-the number of people that may actually be here on any given day-they also fall far below the national average. Waco, Texas, a city of about 117,000 people, had 692 auto thefts in 2005. Annapolis had 150.

Statistics such as these do not consider the large numbers of visitors that swell the daily populations and create public safety of cities like Annapolis and Ocean City. Improving Public safety in Annapolis depends on working with the real statistics, and not playing a “number’s game.”


I mean, this is incredible. The mayor is intensely laboring to defend the record. To her, this is a problem of statistics. She is just getting to how she intends to "solve" the problem.

Public Safety Initiatives by the City of Annapolis –August, 2007.

1. Increase visibility of existing police personnel

The pool of personnel for public safety has been depleted nationally by the war in Iraq and other Homeland security programs. Like other jurisdictions around the country, Annapolis is facing new challenges.

Reduce the number of shifts at the Annapolis Police Department from the current five to three. This will increase the number of officers available for each shift and result in a higher level of visibility and protection and the most efficient deployment of available officers.

This is crazy. Rather than hire more actual officers, the mayor plans to adjust the patrols to make it look like we have more officers. Unbelievable. By the way, this is not a new idea. None of this stuff is a new initiative that the mayor has come up with in response to the increasing citizen concerns. This is all recycled ideas from last year.

Purchase 4 additional Segways. Segways increase “feet on the street” by providing greater mobility and allowing officers to cover a wider area.

So does a bicycle. Or more officers. Why do we need Segways? They are like thousands of dollars each.

Examine the feasibility of adding one horseback mounted unit to the City’s police force. Officers on horseback are highly visible and research shows that in crowd and emergency situations a single mounted officer is equal to ten officers on foot. This allows foot officers to be deployed elsewhere.

I once fell off a horse. Oh, and this is a terrible idea. Good for riot control, meaningless for drug enforcement.

2. Improve recruiting efforts

Returning from a National Conference on Employee Recruitment, Director of Human Resources Kimla Milburn offered new insights and outlined some tips for successful recruiting.

"In speaking with my colleagues from around the country, it is evident that we are all facing tremendous challenges in recruiting police officers," she said. "Positive statements about the department go a long way in encouraging people to consider a career with the APD. Negative articles and Letters to the Editor bashing the Department simply do not help. We need to work together to increase the level of interest in working for the Annapolis Police Department."

There is no shortage of applicants.

Enhance recruitment efforts by creating a team of ambassadors to help bring officers to the Annapolis Police Department. The team will include Director of Human Resources Kimla Milburn, Public Information Officer Ray Weaver and the members of the City's Public Safety Committee-Aldermen Ross Arnett, Dave Cordle and Alderwoman Sheila Findlayson."

Create new brochures and marketing messages and materials.

"A team of ambassadors" armed with wagon-loads of "new brochures and marketing messages and materials" is a steaming heap of useless horsecrap. I can tell you from several years of recruitment efforts that cash is king. It's not the only factor, but in the case of police, it is reasonable to assume that being an officer in Annapolis is roughly the same as anywhere else. That being the case, if we pay more, we get more officers. The mayor will have you believe that we pay more already, but since a $5000 signing bonus goes away, we really don't. (On a side note, the sister city budget is thriving).

Also, why should we even worry about this since our crime rate is so much lower than the national average?

3. Fight illegal guns and drugs

Request the City delegation to the General Assembly to submit legislation designating the entire City of Annapolis a Drug-Free Zone. This action will double the fines to anyone convicted of dealing drugs in the City.

I've never understood this one. Are drugs more illegal in some parts of the city than others? Why is there even debate on whether or not the entire city is a drug-free zone? I guess they teach that at the FBI National Academy and the Southern Police Institute.

“We need to send a clear message that dealing drugs in the City of Annapolis will not be tolerated,” said the Mayor. “Hitting dealers in their pocketbook, doubling their jail time and in general making Annapolis a hostile environment to this type of activity will help convince dealers that our City is not a place they want to be.”

Great. Couldn't agree more.

Request the City delegation ask for additional state funds for a comprehensive drug plan for both treatment and prevention in the City of Annapolis.

If we can get more money, fine. It doesn't hurt to ask. However, treatment programs benefit users rather than dealers, and don't get at the bigger crime problem.

Initiate a new illegal drugs and illegal guns task force with State & Federal agencies.

This was already going on--even before the mayor announced it the first time.

“In 2006, the Annapolis Police Department made 275 arrests on drugs and conducted 45 raids,” said Mayor Moyer. “The goal of this unified effort is to double the number of arrests and to make it crystal clear that the Capital City is not a Drug Capital.”

Yes, who knows how bad it would be if the message "that the Capital City is not a Drug Capital" was muddled and murky.

3. Forge partnerships with communities

Call on citizens to identify places in the City that need better lighting
.

This, of course, would never happen because leaving lights on is anti-environment, and environmental chicanery is the #1 Moyer priority.

“Leave your porch and outside lights on or set them up on motion detectors-people that are up to no good don’t like bright lights,” said Mayor Moyer. “If you see a dark place, or a street light out anywhere in the City, call us and we’ll work with your Alderman, Public Works and BG and E to get the lighting improved. We want to help you improve your sense of security and safety in your neighborhood.”

Continue training for Neighborhood Watch. Since the beginning of the program in the mid 90’s, 7000 citizens have attended Neighborhood Watch training sessions. In the past year, over 1400 citizens have actively participated in the program.

The whole point of Neighborhood Watch is to identify problems, then report them to the police. The citizens are already doing this!

Continue the collaborative process with at risk neighborhoods.

This........

Continue the “Heroes” mentoring program for at-risk youths

....sounds......

Offer more real-world job skills training programs like the Sherwin Williams painting program that offers at-risk adults the chance to learn a marketable skill.

.......vague and without substance. Also, other training programs include the "Maryland State Archives historic preservation program", the "Parole Town Center city council lobbying program", and the "Worst Idea Ever, Al Gore memorial O-27-07 green collar job program".

5.* Develop a new agreement between the City of Annapolis and the Housing Authority on the use of existing dollars for public safety.

(*I don't know what happened to #4, so don't ask.)

HA!! "Developing a new agreement" actually means "figuring out how to justify not paying HACA the $200,000 we already owe them", because that's what's happening. Rumor is another lawsuit may be in the works.

"Since 2004 Annapolis has provided the Housing Authority with $200,000 to employ police officers to work as off duty security," said Mayor Moyer. "This money was to be matched with HACA funds for a $400,000 public safety program. HACA has not utilized all of the City’s contribution. It has also been unsuccessful in recruiting from other law enforcement agencies. We need to clarify accountability for services and define roles and responsibilities.”

No BS: I didn't read this last paragraph before making the "HA" comment--it was just sheer clairvoyance and understanding of the situation. The Mayor is feuding with Eric Brown and is not paying the city's invoices.

Ok, the rest of this you can read on your own--there's not very much more. By now I hope you get the point.

The Mayor proposes that a new and separate agreement of understanding be negotiated to include shared costs and partnership on:

-The use of surveillance cameras
-A sub station program
-Agreement on the assignment of undercover police in the area and enhanced Neighborhood Watch
-Implementation of community service programs for All HACA residents as required by HUD

New initiatives

-Continue working on a revitalization district for Clay and Washington Street
-Install speed cameras on Duke of Gloucester Street
-Propose amendments to the City Code to strengthen the noise ordinance

Request that the City’s Community and Housing Board review successful housing programs in other jurisdictions, research opportunities for home ownership and social service needs and recommend the changes in our federal housing program required to enhance public safety. Some changes may require federal or state legislation.

Saturday, December 1, 2007

Does Anyone Like What The Administration Is Doing With Crime?

With a record number of homicides in the city this year, and 2 shootings in the past 2 days, you may be wondering what is happening with hiring new officers. The answer is nothing:
We are bracing for as many as 6 or 7 retirements at the end of the year. One young officer will have his last day on Dec 9. he has been hired by a small PA dept. Still no hiring to speak of. In spite of what Will Scott said in the newspaper we are now 26
officers short. Most all officers have been placed back in patrol. The NET unit
is gone, Foot patrol is now gone and Special operations is left with 3 officers.
CID detectives are handling cases at a volume not seen before. Anne Arundel County has a homicide unit with about 10 officers. they have had about 13 homicides. APD does not have a homicide unit and just investigated the 9th homicide.I don't know what is keeping the officers that are still here.
Depending on who you ask, the responsibility for hiring police officers lies either with a particular officer in the police department, or with the human resources department. What is clear, is that there is little the city council can do about it.

Upon returning from a 6 week voyage to Europe to develop Annapolis' sister city program, the mayor made a series of proclamations that were presumably aimed at reducing crime. The glaring omission in the city's crime plan is the refusal to commit the resources necessary to hiring a full compliment of officers.

Friday, November 30, 2007

Shhhhh: Don't Tell The Mayor

The Capital today sadistically featured alternative police vehicles, a measure certain to tempt the mayor's fancy for such things:



You will be tempted to yield to the argument: "You see? This other jurisdiction was smart enough to get these vehicles. Annapolis should too."

Not so fast!

"It's another tool we can use. It's great for crowd control," said Officer Matt Warehime of the Department of General Services Police. "You can get out to different areas you can't get to in a car."

Likewise, Officer William Jackson said the Segways are good for crowd control
and have the added benefit of being able to go inside buildings.

Mr. Collins said the solar cart, Segways and bikes allow his officers to do a
better job keeping the government complex secure. And they have the added
benefit of being good for the environment.

When was the last time you heard someone say "man, if only we could control those crowds in the public housing, our city would be so much better"? Umm, never. Let's do stuff that fights drugs and violent crime, like filling police officer vacancies.

Saturday, November 10, 2007

11/10 Update on Police Hiring

I forgot to include this information with my commentary on Alderman Arnett's meeting with the public.

He said that at any given time, there are 13 (that's thirteen--a baker's dozen) officers patrolling. That sounds like an awfully low number.

He also gave an update on hiring. I was under the impression that we had 2 laterals (transfer officers), but Alderman Arnett says we have at least 6 and maybe more than that.

Further guidance was provided regarding the most recent entrance exam. Apparently 35 or so people passed the exam*, and 16 of those people have passed the first round of background checks.

(*I think there were over a hundred people to take this exam....only 36 passed? Why didn't everyone just guess 'C'??!)

I'll let you know when somebody else says something totally different about this matter--probably next week.

Tuesday, November 6, 2007

11/6 Update On Police Hiring

The most recent (unofficial) information that I have regarding police hiring is this:

-2 'laterals' (transfers from other departments), one from Baltimore and another from the Eastern Shore, in training. I believe they only have to go through the in-house training, since they would have already gone to a police academy.

-2 people from the most recent entrance exam in the Police Academy.

Problems:

1. 2 + 2 < 23.

2. Police Academies. Annapolis doesn't have a police academy, and can't send recruits to the AA county academy because they hire our officers away from us! So we have to coordinate with MoCo and HoCo, I think.

3. Pay. Even with a $5000 signing bonus, recruits are being lured away to other departments.

4. Mayor still silent on issue.

Saturday, October 13, 2007

Inside Crime Information

I received this comment today:

15 year APD officer has left a new comment on your post "Still No Word On Police Hiring Plans":

Here it is as I see it. Several months ago we were told that we were hiring 4 officers from Baltimore city. We were told they were Puerto Ricans that Baltimore had recruited. None were ever hired. Then we were told that they were ready to hire 4 more lateral officers. Just last week I heard that the 4 was down to two. So as far as I know we have two lateral officers starting October 18, 2007.

Now for the bad news, I know of eight officers who have either just left APD of will retire by the first of the year. We also have several officers out hurt. CID is short handed, Patrol is short handed and foot patrol currently has no officers (one vacancy, one retirement, two out hurt). No additional tests have been given. No one has been hired from the last test yet.

Yesterday was the largest job fair in the area held at the AACO fairgrounds. I counted about 8 police departments in attendance but no APD (well at least not behind the tables!). It sure looks like a lot of talk but no action on the hiring front. Capt. B. Hopkins has been in charge of hiring for 20 years. It is time for a change. 15 year APD officer.

Unfortunately I don't have much time to meet face to face with officers, but if you go by the information we have here, the attitude of the higher-ups is hard to fathom.

Let's say for a minute that the mayor has a valid point: that every jurisdiction including APD is facing hiring difficulties because of the war in Iraq. If that was true, shouldn't we join every other department in trying to recruit as much as possible?

Also, saying that there needs to be a change in personnel doesn't mean the person in the current position is bad: just ask New York Yankees manager Joe Torre. I think that a fresh voice can be beneficial.

Hopefully we will AT LEAST replace the officers that are leaving/retiring, but right now it's just too risky to be optimistic.

Friday, October 12, 2007

Still No Word On Police Hiring Plans

One article that I read in the last month made mention of the police department hiring 8 new officers, but as a police officer who reads this site pointed out, that seems awfully fast. After passing the recruitment exam, there's the academy along with various evaluations and other tests.

(The officer also pointed out that this was the first he/she was hearing of the new hires, and that he/she would know if new people were around.)

I just want to hear the plan. For example:

"Step 1. Give entrance exam."
"Step 2. Send 50 people through evaluation and training process."
"Step 3. Hire the best 23 people that make it through."

The best we've heard so far are vague references that faintly suggest that more officers will be hired. If you are the next person who get robbed, you will know we need more than that.

Thursday, July 5, 2007

Capital Punishment: Ugh, Ward 1

I really hope that this 2 a.m. bill comes up for a vote soon, because it is getting burdensome to refute these Ward 1 letters. An esteemed colleague of mine, who happens to live in Acton's Landing along with this letter writer, acutely cautioned against making this into an elitist issue, but this is an elitist letter if I have ever seen one. It appeared on July 4.

Regarding a letter supporting the 2 a.m. curfew:

I doubt these recent residents of Annapolis have any understanding of the negative effects of the bars downtown. Residing in Acton's Landing, they may never understand the bars' effect on downtown and its residents.

Look at this. Already. In the first two sentences. We have not lived where you live for as long as you live so we can't possibly understand what you are talking about or have valid opinions of our own. This is classic arrogance.

Living In Acton's Landing, they will probably never:

-Wake up to find their flower pots thrown in the streets.
-Have their flags stolen or vandalized.
-Have their parked cars vandalized.
-Have to clean up vomit or used condoms in their yards.
-Deal with the broken beer bottles in the street and on the sidewalk.

I have news for you, my friend.....YES WE WILL!!!!!. This type of stuff happens everywhere, including my house here in Ward 5. Also, living in Acton's Landing, you are at the mercy of about 5 bars, maybe. I will give you the benefit of the doubt on this one, but I for one find it hard to believe that your house lies on a major walking route of drunk people. I mean, do the people who perpetrate the above behavior really leave O'Briens and walk past your house en route to their boat slip on the end of Franklin St.? BUT, MOST IMPORTANTLY, ENDING ALL LIQUOR SERVICE AT MIDNIGHT WILL NOT STOP THIS BEHAVIOR!!!! Now stopping drinking altogether might help a little bit.....for more info on prohibition click here. This is how to solve the problem you are referencing:

1. Raise the cost of a liquor license. For argument's sake, quadruple it.
2. Free up more money, perhaps by giving out fewer grants.
3. Use the extra money to offer police officers more than a 2% raise, thereby filling the 20 open vacancies on the police force.
4. USE THE EXTRA POLICE TO ENFORCE THE LAWS THAT ALREADY EXIST REGARDING PUBLIC INTOXICATION AND VANDALISM.
5. Increase fines for the above violations, thereby perpetuating the process.
6. Would anyone vote for me for mayor?

Let's continue....

Unless they walk downtown in the morning, they will probably never appreciate the volume and type of garbage that the city and residents have to clean up. They may never have to deal with the drunken driving and excessive street noise that excessive drinking brings.

Are you really saying that the only people who deal with drunk driving are downtown residents? Also, last time I checked all garbage was pretty much the same: gross. What is it about the particular type of garbage that you mention will we not appreciate? People have willingly paid taxes in exchange for services such as garbage removal for, like, ever.

Downtown is as nice as it is only because its residents are willing to fight to protect the quality of live that we have.

No, downtown is nice because it has attractive topography, historical context, charismatic residents and businesses, and the benefit of essential city services paid for by our tax dollars.

We protect it because we love downtown and understand what excessive drinking can do. More drinking equals more problems. Ask the police.

Ok, again, if you want to take to position that nobody should be drinking go right ahead. If not, the way to allow responsible drinking while reducing the problems is to punish the offenders via strictly enforced, meaningful punishments. That way, people will shift their behavior away from your definition of problem behavior in response to the incentive structure they are faced with.

The residents of downtown are asking how Alderwoman Classie Hoyle, D-Ward 3, benefits from suggesting extending the bar curfew.

Your sixth sense is correct here. It is AP's overwhelming suspicion that Alderwoman Hoyle is acting on behalf of one particular aggrieved bar owner and not on behalf of her constituents or the city citizens as a whole. Her motives may be improper, but the result of the bill would not be.

It is clear how many of the party establishments, many of which are owned and managed by out-of-towners, would benefit. I suppose most of those owners and managers don't really care what happens to downtown Annapolis. The downtown residents do.
MARY KOENIGSHOFF, Annapolis

I had really hoped that I could prove that most owners lived in the city limits, but that proved harder than I have time for. Readily available are the addresses of liquor license holders, but these names are often not the owners. Certainly some of these situations arise because the owners do not live in the city and the license holder must live within the limits, but I also noticed specific examples of listed owners who do live in the city but are not on the liquor license for whatever reason. Feeling defeated, I will not revert to a more obvious but equally valid argument. OF COURSE THEY CARE WHAT HAPPENS TO DOWNTOWN ANNAPOLIS. If downtown goes to hell nobody will come there and they will go out of business.

It's a good thing that I finished writing this post when I did, because I need a drink and at this time I can still get one wherever I want.