The only thing more repugnant than this flyer is the fact that Hoyle remained silent about it until AFTER the election. Now, she plans to introduce a resolution condeming it???? The hypocricy of such a resolution by Hoyle is nausiating.
Would anyone have called it satire, if it had been a flyer that used the N word and was for "Friends and Supporters of White Annapolis"? I think not. You'd have the ACLU here, and Carl Snowden would be "demanding" that the election be declared null and void. We'll see if that kind of double standard takes place in the upcoming investigation.
Logically, if "White & Gay = Sin," then Black & Gay" = not Sin. Further, if one removes the common element, it is clear what makes "White & Gay = Sin," namely, being White.
Perhaps the silver ring holds the answer to this riddle.
7 comments:
The only thing more repugnant than this flyer is the fact that Hoyle remained silent about it until AFTER the election. Now, she plans to introduce a resolution condeming it???? The hypocricy of such a resolution by Hoyle is nausiating.
Bob McWilliams
Are there any black folks who can enlighten The Man about the "silver ring" comment?
Does white gold count?
I still think it has to be a satire piece.
Satire or not, it is disgusting and the satire was lost on many.
Satire!?!
Would anyone have called it satire, if it had been a flyer that used the N word and was for "Friends and Supporters of White Annapolis"? I think not. You'd have the ACLU here, and Carl Snowden would be "demanding" that the election be declared null and void. We'll see if that kind of double standard takes place in the upcoming investigation.
Bob McWilliams
It's just too over the top to be serious. "Wears a Silver Ring." You couldn't make this stuff up.
Logically, if "White & Gay = Sin," then Black & Gay" = not Sin. Further, if one removes the common element, it is clear what makes "White & Gay = Sin," namely, being White.
Perhaps the silver ring holds the answer to this riddle.
Post a Comment